Three best photos after my opinion:
Information about aperture, ISO etc can be found in the picture description.
The Project Exam is to develop an authentic graphic design project for a real or fictitious client (being a company, an organisation or a small business). If choosing a client You must approach them yourself, and maintain a client-designer relationship throughout the project period.
Prior to designing the project, you are to submit a written Project Description and a Work Schedule, which must be approved by the school before the Project can begin.
I chose a fictitious client, Barfot Villmarksterapi. Description in pdf above.
Here is my report:
Enlightenment office (OEK) for eggs and meat want to create a recipe book targeted towards stu-dents and young adults. The booklet will contain content regarding eggs – a cheap commodity with infinite possibilities. The booklet will consist of a front and back cover, a preface, content repository, recipe and contact information. Please see attachment for text and images to use. You are not al-lowed to edit the text whatsoever but you can select which images you prefer to use and which image suits the product best.
Recommended format: A5 (h210mm. x w148mm.)
Here is my work:
Note: managed to use the same photo twice for two different recipes, but this is how I turned it in, so it’ll have to do.
Compare the design (in terms of pace and contrast) of an online magazine, blog or website to that of a printed magazine, book or journal.
The issue we have in our bookshelf is from June 2016. It is common knowledge that the yellow square stands for National Geographic, and most people know it for the respective organization that it is.
The magazine’s front page has a thick yellow outline that also reaches over the spine, but not further. The front page includes the main issue of the months magazine, which is shown with one big picture and minimal texting. It is simple, intriguing, timeless, beautiful, and tempts me to open it and have a look at it’s intestants.
The text is centered,and everything is symmetrical, and it works quite well with the picture.
First thing that struck me was “wow, less noisy”. The yellow square is there, several places, but it does not have the same weight as the magazine. My first assumption was that the magazine needs to stand out next to tons of other magazines in the shop shelfs, and this is probably to make it more visible to the consumer. Actually, it’s just about the format. National Geographic is an organization that focuses on quality, and they have (of course) made the squared yellow outline in correct proportions according to scale.
The webpage is simple. Very little noise, no interruptions.
Front page. The header remains the same size regardless of zoom on screen. The weight on the left side of the menu does not take your attention from the right side of the menu, as the search sign and menu sign is bolder and easier to regognize than the letters to the left. Your eyes go to the left first in the menu, due to the weight of the logo, but end up on the most important element very quickly.
The first thing I saw was the logo in the header, then the quote in the header, then the logo in the menu, then the search and menu sign in the menu. It creates a pleasant flow of eye movement, natural and easy. Of course I cannot tell for sure that each person will perceive it the same way.
Bottom of page. Simple, silent, easy to understand. Easy to subscribe, easy to follow. Weight of Sign Up-button is centered, and creates a sense of balance and symmetry with the unsymmetrical parts on the sides as the follow icons seem surrounded by space, though I must admit I feel more tempted to hit follow than to subscribe as a consequence to what looks simpler.
This is what happens when you click the magnifyer icon. I mean, how beautiful is that? Look at the timelessness, the simplicity. Wow. It makes me excited to be here. It makes my search feel more important. It also makes it easier to avvoid spelling errors.
Sea of Hope. The photo grid seems unsymmetrical.
The photo grid follows scroll.
Sea of Hope beautifully marks the ending spot for the connected subjects.
Photo of the day follows your scrolling.
There are so many exciting and beautiful effects on National Geographic’s web page. I can not begin to describe half of them. Turning over pages in the printed magazine is a great experience, each page beautifully layed out, every element perfectly placed, every photo of excellent quality. And I am not disappointed by the web page.
Similarities: National Geographic seems to carry out the same personality trates in each media, both magazine and web page, and I must say that it is beauty, quality and intellect.
For the articles in the printed magazine, they use two grids. The open space at the top is larger than the other outlining space.
Notes of critique: I am less impressed by the layout of the articles online. The width of the text is narrow, and it leads to a lot of unnecessary scrolling. I don’t have adblock on Chrome, so there are popups on the sides of the text. I don’t know if the text box width is this narrow to avvoid popups coming in the middle of the text, but I’m assuming it’s only because it’s adapted to smart phone and tablet users.
Personally I would use the printed magazine for reading articles, and the web site for watching movies, entering photo competitions etc..
The design of the menu is exhilarating, the preview on the left changes as your mouse hoovers over the different subjects, making it incredibly easy to find what’s interesting to you.
Final words: I could honestly cry from the immense quality of both of the products, and as a result of this learning activity I have subscribed to the printed magazine and full access to the online content.
I have not included photos of the magazine as I ran out of battery on my phone before I got to snap the quick shots. Will do so by tuesday.
Brief: Using InDesign, design a 4-page brochure for a fictitious travel agent.
I didn’t use a fake body copy, but here is the PFD: brochure_extremetravels
The first page shows the back and front page, second page shows content middle.
All photos are legally downloaded at Pixabay.
Take a magazine, newspaper or book that includes images and text. Lay tracing paper over the top of three spreads (both left-hand and right-hand pages). Using a pencil and ruler, carefully trace the grid underlying the page layouts. Remember to remove specific text elements or images, and to only draw the grid lines. Note column widths and margin sizes at the top, bottom, and to the left and right of the main body of text. Is your document based on a two-column, three-column, or another type of grid? Which elements stay the same on each page, and which change?
This book uses two grids, with an exeption of pages more focused on information than litterary expression, such as equipmentlists and other more generalized information which are put in pages within a blue square, using three columns.
Here is the oversight of grids in the three-columned page setup.
Here is the layout of every other page in the book, which I’m assuming is the master grid. It is built on two grids, which vary slightly in height as the length of text varies. On pages with photos, the photo stretches from left bleed on left page to end of first grid on the following page, which proves that the two-paged layout is the main layout, even used when grids are not visible through text columns. The style is symmetrical, but it can be argued that there is a sense of asymmetrical layout on pages with photos stretching further than one page. I would disagree, as they measure identically with the grid at their ending points.
The head, fore edge, back and foot carry out symmetrical identities (sizes). This creates readability and simplicity, two favorites of mine and many others.
Produce at least two different versions of each effect, recording your results each time. Explain in one or two sentences what you wanted to achieve (as shown in your manual).
Second attempt at tension did not quite succeed at expressing the feeling as the first one. I think it’s because I got it right the first time, and trying to recreate the same thing without repeating the same method made it the failure that it is.
The sketch with several rectangles is not a part of the assignment. I just wanted to try something out with more elements than two.